In electronic brainstorming, each participant silently contributes ideas which, in turn, stimulates new thinking by other members of the group. As facilitator, I was then able to merge duplicate skills, sort them if needed, then collect the group's votes to calculate a group priority. The whole process went extremely fast as there was little debate or political wrangling involved in this computer-mediated process. At this stage no long-winded explanations were required, no one had to defend their submissions, no one had to defend their position from other individuals or from the group. Of course, this is what makes the job of the human facilitator so important. Proper use of the system requires a facilitator who can flexibly respond to the advantages of the computerized process and the individual's need for personal expression. It is a line that the facilitator must constantly redraw as the need arises.

The second phase of our process was even more challenging. After determining what skills were in greatest demand, I asked the group what could be done about the IT labor shortage. Again we were able to use technology to generate and prioritize ideas while providing an equally creative, and supportive method of expression for everyone in the group. In the exploration phase, no one was allowed to turn thumbs down on anyone else's idea. This encourages participation and precludes intimidation. After going through a slightly more complex process of consensus building here is what our group said:

We must customize rewards and compensation based on the needs and motivations of each employee. Just as many industries have moved to mass customization to improve their sales, we must use a similar process to reach out to our own employees. Where one employee's concerns might be structured around childcare issues, another is equally concerned with growth and educational opportunity.

People are too complex to be adequately characterized using the well-known Maslov's Hierarchy of Needs where individual actualization supercedes all other concerns. The more highly motivated, skilled, and educated a person is, the more likely they are to place dependable meaning, commitment, and loyalty at the top of their value structures.

Competitive compensation packages are a must, but if individualized and creatively structured they can offer more value to the individual at less cost to the company. Compensation needs to be within 10 to 15 percent of the benchmark level and special bonuses are appropriate for critical skills and performance on long-term projects. Company-paid, personal financial planning is an interesting option to explore, and upgraded pension plans for top performers could be attractive to both company and employee.

Health and productivity are intimately interrelated. People can exceed 40-hour workweeks for only short periods before their 80-hour weeks become less productive than the shorter work schedules. You can call for special efforts in short bursts, but extended physical and mental stress sicken the body and dull the mind. Company exercise programs, company sports programs, sabbaticals, adequate staffing, and elimination of on-call assignments are important to maintaining a sharp and energetic work force.

Employee's families should be involved in reward programs and company recreational activities. Day-care centers are important to this family orientation and could help recruit single parents to the IT team.

Rewards should be based on achievement and special attention reserved for service given to clients and other team members.

Executives must support workers more than workers support executives. Employees need to be empowered in defining their work, pay, benefits, flex time, and job sharing. Involving employees in goal setting and strategic direction creates "buy-in," building commitment and motivation.

Smart employees have long recognized that preparation and advanced skills command the greatest reward. Our colleagues are more than willing to retool themselves, but they need proactive support from the corporation in terms of educational programs, financial support, and time. Employees want degrees, advanced certificates, exposure to leading-edge technology, and leadership training as much as they want direct financial compensation.

While building a practice in leadership development, executive coaching, team building, and change management, I have had a chance to pioneer computer-mediated idea generation and consensus building techniques. So far, I have met with success in terms of time and money saved for my clients, new opportunities discovered, and successful projects arising from solid foundations.

If you have questions about the process please contact me and I will be glad to share my experience. Please also feel free to contribute ideas regarding solving the CIO's People Dilemma.